>>490
>>491
Whether the rule gets changed or not who does it even effect? No one even uses /clop/ so it can't be argued that foalcon attracts people to this site, and on the other side of that coin if it was banned no one would be missing anything.
Still I find it an interesting discussion.
The way I see it the fact that an individual is jerking off to a cartoon in the first place is already a "red flag" so to speak. It's tied to mental conditions that correlate with unsavory behavior (le tism). These things are caused by high mutational load so people with one degenerate kink are much more likely to have other phychological issues from a statistical standpoint. Obviously on a case by case basis some people are much more extreme and fucked up than others, but the basic point stands.
I could potentially see the merit of an argument that if you draw a line it keeps the worst cases out, but it runs into issues.
Ponies evoke neotenic traits. They already look childish from a phychological standpoint. In that sense trying to differentiate between foalcon and "normal" pony porn is an intelectual distinction but not so much of an emotional one.
Also, anons here show a clear preference for anatomical correctness which is it's whole own thing.
In a sense the most logically consistant argument is that we shouldn't be allowing NSFW at all.
Watch this video this guy does a very good analysis:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlOQdr4S95c