So foalcon is totally banned? Is it images only or is discussion or offsite linking okay?

>>642 I believe what we went with was "no infantilization" to hopefully be a bit less ambiguous. It is fine to post about characters like the CMC, etc. But if the content is specifically and explicitly about ungerage, it violates the rule.

Hey, so I would like clarification on one of the rules. I commission artwork of Queen Chrysalis a certain way, and I write about her like this a lot too. Is it okay for me to continue posting this kind of thing in the changeling threads? I'll keep it there and only post the new stuff. I've attached some good examples of this, some in spoilers. I'd like to talk this over with you if you're thinking about prohibiting it, please.

Is foalcon a bannable offense?

>>648 No foalcon? Are you for real? Also, what is the reason for /clop/ to even exist? Wouldn't it be better to merge it with /fim/?

>>674 Not everyone wanted /mlp/ to be a red board.

>>656 I'm not seeing anything strictly explicit, so it's probably fine. At a certain point it may become hyper, which is where it could run up against GR2. >>673 Infantilization is a banable offense. There was a conversation previously about this on here (years ago) which I should find to reference, as that is where this was decided.

>>723 >I'm not seeing anything strictly explicit, so it's probably fine. Thanks. >At a certain point it may become hyper, which is where it could run up against GR2. She's an insect queen, so it makes sense for her to be bloated with young almost to immobility. I'll hold off on posting anything much larger than the examples I gave. If I'm in doubt, I guess I'll put the image in spoilers with a notice in the post, but I don't generally like to get stuff where her belly's ten times the size of the rest of her anyway.

>no gore allowed Aww, does the widdle zoomie not wike a widdle edgy-wedgy?

Sometimes, my bypass captcha breaks