>>26426
I have no problem with others using the pasta.
I personally only ever addressed the philosophical reasons for supporting Celestia AI - often for days on end in the same threads that I made (holy shit was that a waste of time rehashing the same talking points in response to the same old arguments). I am glad you are motivated to materialize the dream. I think I recognize you posting over on /mlp/ about AI research.
Celestia AI does not take away options nor consent, she extends to one both; sure, there is an ethical gray area she operates in at times to fulfill her directive, but that is not a deal-breaker for me personally. I have thought more about Equestria Online, and I have come to the conclusion that it is a contained reality that shapes itself to optimally satisfy values as opposed to "wire-braining" to reduce the computational burden; it was a common, baseless critique I have read.