>>752 There will not be a list beyond the current one as it would be impossible to enumerate. The list is given as an example. What is or isn't considered an extreme fetish is determined by the staff as it appears. Meaning that there will be discussion among the staff to determine whether something is considered extreme or not.

>>753 So given >>>/clop/1039 ( https://nhnb.org/clop/res/1039.html ) it can be assumed that societal takeover/ludicrously extreme BDSM content is permitted (as long as it doesn't violate other caveats of GR2)? eg. Fall of Equestria, Whitekitten (both his [unnamed cocksupremacy] and [Rise of Reason] settings), Clocktower Society, and the existing example of Zebra Supremacy (Z-Book, etc.)? I can enumerate the content each contains (and other content that may be in the same niches) but for brevity i will not immediately do so. Unrelated since i have you here: posting to /qa/ is notably more difficult than /fim/ and /clop/ due to the bypass having a low limit apparently. No, i don't get it either.

>>754 The stripped thread is probably a bit borderline. There has been some consideration by staff whether or not it would be in violation of GR2, perhaps leaning towards "possibly". But I think the current situation is that we've not come to a definitive answer quite yet. Zebra x Pony should be fine, it's more so about the strange obsession aspect or whatever you'd call it. which seems to surround it. >Unrelated since i have you here: posting to /qa/ is notably more difficult than /fim/ and /clop/ due to the bypass having a low limit apparently. Likely due to board thread lock limit rather than bypass. It is set lower on /qa/ than on /fim/ or /clop/. I'll increase it a little to to make it a bit easier for Anons to ask questions.

>>757 I believe the (intended) difference between the booru tags 'zebradom' [dominant zebra] and 'zebra supremacy' [raceplay, in execution] is effectively the line you're looking for. Most don't seem to have problems with Zebra x Pony unless they have a preexisting problem with Interspecies as a whole. The only booru i know even tries to maintain this line instead of using the furry-imported definition as policy (where 'zebradom' covers only the raceplay definition) is Twibooru, though. Mostly from apathy. >Fix for posting problem thank ye kindly Final questions then i'll fuck off until i find more of them: Watersports is banned, correct? A BDSM thread would be permitted (assuming it didn't go horribly deep ala the already-provided examples, save for maybe the less obscene Clocktower Society stuff)?

>>759 >Watersports is banned, correct? Let me talk with staff and gather some thoughts. It's also possible there may have been previous discussion on /qa/ regarding the subject. >A BDSM thread would be permitted (assuming it didn't go horribly deep ala the already-provided examples, save for maybe the less obscene Clocktower Society stuff) I can't say of heard of "Clocktower Society" before, so I can't comment on that. But it sounds like you've got the general idea.

>>757 >it's more so about the strange obsession aspect or whatever you'd call it. which seems to surround it. Not much different than cucking stallions with humans like in the milf threads and elsewhere, or /DontFuckBatPonies/ which is just as obsessive about human society getting outbred. Anon getting MARED, Colonizing ponies with humans males only, race-play and dom/sub is a common fetish ground when you have ponies

>>760 It being banned would be in-line with the existing ban on general waste fetishes. >Clocktower tl;dr BDSM shadow society. The most intense it gets is lifelong stuff and some minor body modification stuff, it's mostly there for completion's sake. Thanks for at least considering these questions. >>761 D/S is, Raceplay is a recent (~last 2 years, less than for BatSpam) addition and not a wholly welcome one. There is a reason i avoid these threads now. Rather, avoided, i suppose, since they don't exist now.

I don't like striped stuff either, but if they keep it in their thread I don't really care.

>>763 They never do, I've caught them trying to proselytize cross-board and jerking off to making edits of other peoples OCs to "claim" them

>>763 It would be nice if they did that, but they do not as >>764 mentions.

>>762 Raceplay has always existed, and ntr is even more present now getting the free pass of if a human is doing the ntr then its okay, theres also ntr around cadance, and all taken ponies. >>764 How is that different than claiming all ponies crave/submit to human cock and making similar porn of Human/Mare getting claimed then jerking off about it?

>>766 >ntr Yeah, that doesn't make it any less cringe or get any more of a free pass. Especially with the insistence of artists shoving Shining in the background to make it actually NTR. Thanks, Twittersphere and also the growing depravity of society as a whole.

>>767 Yeah, there's people around the board that repeat the ntr starlight is a cuck meme, and will happily promote cucking stallions. But the striped fetish isn't unique at all. Even removing zebras you can run into the same context with X with humans, X with zebras, X with dragons, X with diamond dogs. Whatever race-play there is because there are many different species in the FiM world and that list gets even bigger when you take fan species into the account.

>>768 It would be largely irrelevant if the ban was drawn along lines between 'dominant partner' and 'raceplay', though.

>>769 So all raceplay dominance gets nuked? The /sim/ general from /mlp/ and now here built the entire culture behind that in parallel with the human/pony raceplay.

>>770 >/sim/ that could mean several generals and i recognize none of them on the catalog, you'd need to be specific. >in parallel with raceplay I fail to see why things over the line into raceplay would need an exception if that's where the line ends up drawn?

>>771 Submission is Mandatory. That fetish general is raceplay about how ponies will submit to (dom)humans whether willing(sub) or not(extreme sub/rape). Glorifying sub/rape raceplay ala striped or with humans isn't any different when looking at the bigger picture. There's no real difference between a mare being raped by a human and starting to enjoy it, vs being bred by a zeebra and enjoying it.

>>772 Ah, THAT one. I think we agree that the subject matter is generally the same, just disagree on how to handle it.

>>774 Ah, here's where the misunderstanding is. Let's pull the definitions directly from Twibooru for clarity (though NHNB's implementation may vary). >{Content} featuring a Zebra as the dominant sexual partner. This is fine. This is where a large majority of content would even be, despite the D/S aspects used in some of your examples. >{Content} specifically depicting ’zebra supremacy’; cuckolding, impregnating, ‘striping’, or racially abusing non-zebras. In short, content where the zebra is dominant specifically because of being a zebra or qualities associated specifically with the (fetishized) concept of being a zebra. >Anon holding leash of pony, pony is reluctant, collar has tag fine >Anon holding leash of pony, pony has a brand stating Anon's ownership fine (though possibly stepping on guro if horrifically implemented. failed branding ain't pretty) >Anon holding leash of pony, pony is covered in brands stating ownership by humans (generalized), human dicks only, pony extinction, satyr factory, etc. probably not fine, why the thread was made to ask the question Does this make sense?

Sorry rewording, perfectionst autism. If its generally the same then it should be treated the same with allows or bans like banning the others along with striped. A second peripheral extreme fetish general is the slavepony thread and the same sort of people who are into noncon/dubcon are cool with everything around pony slavery, a good lot of /SiM/ is about sex slaves. but a zebra having a ponyslave might be banned for no real reason. And the hypno fetish thread where the pony has no control but to submit to the sexual desires of the hypnotist. I don't really consume either content, but I don't like rules that are applied lopsidedly otherwise it's hypocritical and a bad ruleset for mods to follow.

>>775 >>Anon holding leash of pony, pony has a brand stating Anon's ownership This isn't any different than an ace of spaces in blacked content. It's merely a parallel that others will turn a blind eye to because it's their fetish. But a tatoo/brand like these are inherently a mark of supremacy over another so it can't be treated differently on an objective stance. Like for instance painting stripes is the same way racedom works to prepare the sub to be owned as a brand that humans do to livestock in the context of fetishes and sapient talking animals.

>>777 >specific ownership by one other is the same as raceplay Nah, you've lost me on that one.

>>777 actually 'lost me' is the wrong term for it, we just disagree on what is into the line of raceplay. sorry, it's 1 in the morning, i'm most retarded at this time.

>>778 Ownership, markings and raceplay overlap constantly. A leash can be petplay or slavery related but petplay with ponies is some form of raceplay due to the natural species difference of FiM animals like ponies. It can be light with just leashes, or involve more degradation fetishism We agree on what's the extreme end of some general awful stuff. cuckoldry of canon relationships, ntr content, replacement fetishism, extinction, breeding stalls, rape But I would definitely reject the idea that just zeebra/pony impregnation should be put under not fine when there's tons of content that has fetishizing humans impregnating and depicting ponies fetishizing humans.

>>780 Admittedly, i'm pretty sure the impreg clause on the definition Twibooru uses was inherited from the fact that when the definition was implemented on Derpi, i think that was a large majority of the content needing tagged. Like i said, pulled for clarity, NHNB implementation will probably be different and they shouldn't be taken as gospel, just guidelines. I don't wholly agree with it being there nowadays either.

>>781 Are you Floorb? It would fit you pulling things from Twibooru. But I think we've exhausted things to talk about for the subject tonight. So have a good night.

>>782 nah, i need to yell at him about drawing though. Agreed on subject exhaustion, i hope the jannies can use it to come to a conclusion. even if it's just a containment thread, it'd be better than what we get anywhere else.

>>766 "HMD" and affiliated ntr-adjacent autism was always slop too, two wrongs don't make a right, but at least its proponents haven't been flooding unrelated threads with "ponyboi" and its affiliated faggotry

>>785 I can pretty much agree with that. The whiteboi stuff that goes beyond just images in blacked threads was often just for demoralizing purposes of non-black, like how Aryanne posters can be directed to demean and demoralize non-white as well as non-pony while recycling extreme content from the other side of /pol/

>>762 We've tentatively decided to allow the current stripped thread, though it will still be subject to GR12 if it appears in other threads. There may be further consideration in the future, but this is where it currently stands. Watersports can be subject to GR2, just wanted to check if there were any further nuance previously discussed.

>>787 Containment thread/oneshot topic, got it. Like that you're already better than the alternative. I got nothing else, if i do end up with any other questions it'll be a new thread. Thanks, boss.

>>787 >Literally just american politics fetish is allowed What is even the point of this website if for every gay thing you ban you allow something twice as gay