>>29726
>I feel like theres some limit because they'd eventually get too large to support their own weight. Sure its a cartoon but theres some internalized logic and physics.
Embers dad
>I feel like theres so much infighting for territory, maybe even dipping into darker territories with predating upon each other, that it isn't that much of an issue.
Clearly not the case, as dragons like each other too much, they hangout, and migrate in mass together; if they were much more aggressive then sure, but I just don't see this as being a thing.
>They could've just shown dragons are so rare because not only will it take centuries to reach adolescence, much less adulthood but they have to compete with others of their kind and their own self-destructive nature which draws other animals.
Not what I would go with, but still better than canon.
>Dragons probably lack the fine dexterity and intellect to do such things.
This ones just wrong.
>Spikes an outlier cause hes raised by ponies.
Saying that Spike is WAY smarter than other dragons because he's raised by ponies, is like saying a negro will be smarter if he's raised by white parents. Dragons don't have an intelligent issue in FIM, they have a (fixable) behavior problem.
>I personally don't mind the biodiversity if it makes sense within the context of the show.
Fair. I think having different types of dragons would be cool, like say: water dragons, ice dragons, electric dragons etc, etc.
P.S. Fluttershy rubs eggs.