>>52
>I guess you'll just have to wait until there's more of a history to go off of.
True. For all the rules in the world, in the end, all that matters is how they are enforced. Still, with that said, I do like to see good rules from the "get go". Knowing how shit usually turns out otherwise kek.
>The hope is that this place will be distinct enough for people to browse it in addition to other places.
I like the strong culture stances such as "No Hooves". Things like that are unifying and good. Defo helps with building identity and personality. Keep that up for sure.
>Apologies if I was a bit brief, I should be able to give some better responses tomorrow.
Na, no worries. I've said my piece for now. I don't wanna come off as too antagonistic.
I can only hope that I've manged to stir your brain alittle about the rules. Its your site so do whatever you want, just don't expect anons to stick around if you make them choke.
Less censorship/restrictions = promotes engagement, fun and creativity. Anons go wild.
More censorship/restrictions = kills joy but makes moding easier. Little traffic and engagement. Slow site.
Pick your poison.